Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.c > #397499

Re: A neat hash table implementation

From Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: A neat hash table implementation
Date 2026-04-12 11:06 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20260412110656.00005cb8@yahoo.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <PN2dnXljE7KPVUj0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <10ra4m9$s1bk$1@dont-email.me> <20260410132512.00005381@yahoo.com> <10rbdsm$18rg8$1@dont-email.me> <10re6b3$3nlm8$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 11 Apr 2026 20:06:43 +0100
HashTables <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
> Michael says, 'Hash tables are very unlike linked lists'. Actually,
> they are very much like linked lists, so I agree with BGB, but 

It sounds like you didn't understand what I was talking about.
The context was "where do professional C programmers tend to use
pre-written libraries vs coding the damn thing from the first
principles as it suits the situation at hand". For hash tables it's
predominantly the former, for linked lists it's often enough the latter.

> I tend to think in more abstract terms.
> 

I tend not to.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A neat hash table implementation highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-04-07 23:38 +0200
  Re: A neat hash table implementation 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jmj@energokod.gda.pl> - 2026-04-08 05:14 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-04-08 09:29 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 01:17 -0500
      Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-10 13:25 +0300
        Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 13:00 -0500
          Re: A neat hash table implementation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-04-10 17:31 -0400
            Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 23:34 -0500
              Re: A neat hash table implementation Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-11 08:20 +0200
                Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 04:19 -0500
              Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-11 20:28 +0300
          Re: A neat hash table implementation HashTables <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-11 20:06 +0100
            Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-12 11:06 +0300
              Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 04:24 -0500
              Re: A neat hash table implementation HashTables <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-12 19:56 +0100
            Re: A neat hash table implementation Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-04-13 08:27 -0700
              Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-13 14:46 -0500
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-14 01:14 +0200
              Re: A neat hash table implementation "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-13 14:42 -0700
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-14 01:17 +0200
          Re: A neat hash table implementation "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 14:19 -0700
            Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 03:36 -0500
        Re: A neat hash table implementation Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-04-10 21:07 +0100
          Re: A neat hash table implementation BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 16:13 -0500
        Re: A neat hash table implementation antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-04-12 14:51 +0000
  Re: A neat hash table implementation Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-08 10:42 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-04-08 21:44 +0200
      Re: A neat hash table implementation makendo <makendo@makendo.invalid> - 2026-04-10 10:40 +0800
  Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 05:42 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-10 13:13 +0300
      Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 13:07 +0200

csiph-web