Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized?

From	cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized?
Date	2026-05-15 21:50 +0000
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<10u84el$in4$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	<10u5a5v$nagc$1@dont-email.me> <10u601c$uo0d$12@kst.eternal-september.org> <10u6ufo$nd7$2@reader1.panix.com> <10u844d$i6t3$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <10u844d$i6t3$1@dont-email.me>,
Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/15/2026 4:02 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
>> In article <10u601c$uo0d$12@kst.eternal-september.org>,
>> Keith Thompson  <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> As far as I can tell, reallocarray() differs from realloc() only
>>> in that it takes two arguments to specify the size, and fails
>>> if the multiplication would overflow (um, I mean wrap around).
>>> realloc(p, n*size) does the same thing in the absence of overflow.
>>> Obviously somebody thought it was worthwhile.
>> 
>> It's a security thing, similar to `explicit_bzero` or
>> `memset_explicit`.  
>
>Fwiw, iirc wrt security. Instead of filling it with 0's, you fill it 
>with data from a TRNG. An attacker can look for parts that are zeros.

No.

	- Dan C.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-14 20:09 +0000
  Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-14 21:10 +0000
    Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-14 23:35 +0000
      Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-14 17:46 -0700
        Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 02:00 +0000
          Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-14 19:22 -0700
            Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 11:02 +0000
              Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-15 14:44 -0700
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 21:50 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-15 14:55 -0700
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-15 15:02 -0700
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-15 22:12 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-05-16 11:38 +0200
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 22:32 +0000
            Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-15 15:23 +0000
              Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-15 17:28 +0000
              Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 17:40 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-15 17:50 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 18:28 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-15 21:35 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-15 15:05 -0700
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-15 22:35 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-15 17:18 -0700
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-16 08:07 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-15 23:44 +0200
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-15 21:47 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-15 22:10 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-05-16 01:13 +0200
                AIX (was Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized?) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 22:30 +0000
                Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-16 08:04 +0000
    Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-15 07:07 +0000
      Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) - 2026-05-15 13:58 +0000
        Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-16 00:25 +0000
  Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-05-14 17:26 -0700
    Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-05-15 02:08 +0000
  Re: Is reallocarray() planned to be standardized? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-05-16 11:28 +0200

csiph-web