Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.c.moderated > #484

Re: Portable/strictly conforming alternative to the "struct hack" (?)

Show all headers | View raw

> anyone who goes to such lengths to caclulate 1 is unlikley to have 
discovered something special

Don't insult me.

> that n_hdr expression looks kind of dodgy, basically it evaluates to 1,

How do you know?

> Look at modern C compilers ... 
this has been perfectly valid, well-behaved C since the 1999 standard: 

Again, I don't like being like an uninformed moron. I know we have C99. I just want to support Visual "Crappy" studio which doesn't. Hence I can't use C99. That's all.
-- 
comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@plethora.net -- you must
have an appropriate newsgroups line in your header for your mail to be seen,
or the newsgroup name in square brackets in the subject line.  Sorry.

Back to comp.lang.c.moderated | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Portable/strictly conforming alternative to the "struct hack" (?) Árpád Goretity <arpad.goretity@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 04:08 -0500
  Re: Portable/strictly conforming alternative to the "struct hack" (?) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2013-09-06 23:24 -0500
    Re: Portable/strictly conforming alternative to the "struct hack" (?) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2013-09-11 17:26 -0500
      Re: Portable/strictly conforming alternative to the "struct hack" (?) Árpád Goretity <arpad.goretity@gmail.com> - 2013-10-03 13:37 -0500
        Re: Portable/strictly conforming alternative to the "struct hack" (?) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-10-08 16:38 -0500

csiph-web