Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Threads across programming languages
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 20:28:16 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <91d6cfbd026154e9b97e97eccc73eb02e4962d5a.camel@gmail.com>
References: <GIL-20240429161553@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <v0ovvl$1ur12$4@dont-email.me> <v0p06i$1uq6q$5@dont-email.me> <v0shti$2vrco$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v0spsh$31ds4$3@dont-email.me> <v0stic$325kv$3@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v0svtn$32o8h$1@dont-email.me> <v0t091$32qj6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v0u90h$3c1r5$4@dont-email.me> <v0v28q$3ku1r$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v105sc$3skqi$1@dont-email.me> <v10adm$3to7r$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v124a6$drbu$1@dont-email.me> <v125f4$e2kl$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v12a4e$f4f1$2@dont-email.me> <v12hf0$gtpa$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <20240503180102.00002f98@yahoo.com> <v13o0b$p9ih$4@dont-email.me> <v15s0l$1al59$1@dont-email.me> <86ikzqtwqr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v1cetc$33b2i$1@dont-email.me> <86cyppru3q.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v1vfqf$4eq2$1@dont-email.me> <f919090a93e5ab7c32c8961a6061c9e6e38c8fc4.camel@gmail.com> <v1vkh6$5f6t$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 14:28:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="299538cafd44f56ea6cc5a7ab87b4436"; logging-data="153820"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mHLUYsI0GuEDjmFP9hr3G"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DvP1ExxqnzJd2uSJkKxmDh/Wsgs=
In-Reply-To: <v1vkh6$5f6t$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:119113

On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 14:13 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 14.05.2024 um 13:46 schrieb wij:
>=20
> > Putting the 'expressivness' aside, I think cpp cannot complete with C a=
nd
> > Assembly if measuring the compiled code size and speed. But I still lik=
e to
> > program in cpp for my own reasons.
>=20
> C and C++ is not much difference in performance for simple programs.
> For complex programs the efford to get high performance in C is enormous
> so that often you'd chose simple approaches; for things you do in C++
> alongside.
>=20
>=20
It depends.=C2=A0Mostly agreed.
I mean=C2=A0if one believes some 'advanced' language/feature WILL make
the program also advanced is simply superstitious, not that simple.