Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: is "x *= ++f * ++f" a valid statement ?
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:51:38 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <87zfrctg6d.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <v2nivh$1pl7o$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v582jb$5hcq$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:51:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4fd171a301c9caad40652f36602e6fff"; logging-data="218327"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18k/TAmNr47s/dknaQ27jxl"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BIHUBCXAIpYzOcLhTRYzjpzqPy0= sha1:vLsqLEfST36WRa2uLZEXIiDvvAY=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:119518

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:
> On 5/23/2024 9:14 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> Is "x *= ++f * ++f" a valid statement ?
>> Or is there implementation defined behaviour ?
>
> For that specific case the result would seem to be identical
> no matter the sequence of the incrementations for int type: f.
> I might not understand this fully.

It's been explained to you in great detail, and for whatever reason you
choose not to understand it.  For the sake of others who might believe
you, I urge you to stop.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */