Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: is "x *= ++f * ++f" a valid statement ? PLO Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:55:25 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 12 Message-ID: <874j9kv5oi.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 02:55:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4fd171a301c9caad40652f36602e6fff"; logging-data="4188361"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uP0XZg9CDtzwb4C44/UHY" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:El4L8CPymh70ZpvRlHT6+hN1Ldc= sha1:LZKwIqIqqc+e6T22k8Ld5/zn3cU= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:119515 olcott writes: [...] > Then make the rule strict left to right unless otherwise specified. > int x = 2 + 3 * 5; // is otherwise specified by operator precedence. No. Are we done here? -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */