Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Eduardo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc Subject: Re: JESUS IS LORD! Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:18:53 -0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: <533e3e3e-d3d4-4643-a7f4-1e865b0393fa@googlegroups.com> <66b6cf3e-9ac9-42e4-ab19-8e5c2229cf14@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: jVg5Q7llIIT2LYa+hb/15A.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120712-0, 12/07/2012), Outbound message X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.basic.visual.misc:1302 "DaveO" escribió en el mensaje news:jtm2eh$4ol$1@dont-email.me... > > "Eduardo" wrote in message > news:jtkb79$gb4$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> >> "Coder X" escribió en el mensaje >> news:jti1r4$3fm$1@dont-email.me... >> >>> Sucks when an atheist knows your material better than you, doesn't it? >> >> You should cite from where you copy pasted: >> http://www.cracked.com/article_18757_5-things-you-wont-believe-arent-in-bible.html > > > Er, he did cite references, his piece is littered with URLs. LOL! It's just a copy paste. > I note you don't bother to argue any of the points raised. Attack the > messenger, is that the Christian method? I don't bother to waste time with stupidity. > Come on, you know the Bible is true so lets see you refute everything he > wrote and give reasons why it's all wrong. The Bible was writen for believers, not for god haters. Why would I spend my time refuting that then? Of course, if there were a benefit I could do it, I could spend two or three hours refuting almost every point, but for what? If you don't want to believe the Bible, and most probably you want readt it. And I don't say I would refute all and every one of the points, because I don't know everything, I always learn new things from the Bible. > If however you cannot refute the arguments then perhaps you might accept > that the Bible is not inerrant (as it plainly is not). Once you accept > there are any parts of the scripture Of course the Bible in not inerrant, because it was copied many times, and some were even memorized and then copied. What is inerrant is the word of God. And that's what one can have studying the Bible, that is what is important. > that are in error you have to look at the entire edifice, once you do that > faith collapses so I understand why you are reticent to address these > issues but please don't just brush them under the carpet. Sticking your > fingers in your ears and saying "la la la" will not make the truth go > away. > > DaveO