Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #4192

Download [BEST] Stacking

Show all headers | View raw

<div>May I have a question here?</div><div></div><div>Is focus stacking available in PS CS6, or the CS6 extended version is required?</div><div></div><div>I guess it should not be an extended feature, as it is available in CS4 and CS5 if I know well. Just want to make sure.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>download stacking</div><div></div><div>DOWNLOAD: https://t.co/z7k5nvE7Es </div><div></div><div></div><div>Splendid article, thank you! For the lay person, is there software you'd recommend for focus stacking besides the more expensive photoshop? Will HDR software like photomatix be able to focus stake? Thank you!</div><div></div><div></div><div>Some years ago I experimented with macro stacking with an old version of photoshop, but I had to do every step by hand. This required so much time that I finally gave up this then extremely time-consuming technique and returned to classic macro, also because in the field you don't find often so steady objects (if they are alive).</div><div></div><div></div><div>It comes in mind that as soon as lightfield cameras can deliver higher image resolutions all this stacking fuzz and the need to limit to shoot only objects that behaves if they are already dead will be passed forever.</div><div></div><div></div><div>I think that the interest in photographing animals in the field is the ability to capture behaviour, such as fighting, feeding and mating.</div><div></div><div>Going out when the insect is at its coldest and immobile prevents such behaviour being observed.</div><div></div><div>The dragonfly in the photograph is not identified and indeed could be difficult to identify, since the view does not show the top of the abdomen or thorax where many characteristic markings are likely to be. Some may regard the image as novel or attractive, but it says little about what the insect is and nothing about what it does, so I do not regard it as being particularly useful nature photography.</div><div></div><div>It should be said that if people become fixated on stacking and want a static subject there are many pinned specimens already in museum collections. Some invertebrates are in decline: no need to kill them. </div><div></div><div>Finally many small animals have been photographed using the scanning electron microscope, with higher DOF and resolution than optical can provide.</div><div></div><div></div><div>heh.. you can also use the machine gun method, especially if you plan to do a little bit of cropping in the final image. In that you simply take a series of shots at your cameras top fps rate while you slowly turn the focus ring, lol.</div><div></div><div>Not the best method for absolute critical sharpness, especially if your camera body vibrates too much, but in stacking you have lots of room to make small adjustments.</div><div></div><div>(Need to be on a tripod of course.)</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Excelently explained! Thanks for this article. </div><div></div><div>Perhaps I should mention another stacking program which lets you mark certain points that one needs to co-ordinate and align throughout the stack.</div><div></div><div>This one is a standalone, so it can be used without Photoshop (for people who use other photo-editing software).</div><div></div><div>It is called RegiStax, current version update is v6.1.08 - requires V6.1 (6 may 2011). You need to have RegiStax 6 installed before installing this update.</div><div></div><div>It is freeware, and although intended for astronomy, it will work with all kinds of images. Find all the versions here:</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Bayesian model averaging is flawed in the M-open setting in which the true data-generating process is not one of the candidate models being fit. We take the idea of stacking from the point estimation literature and generalize to the combination of predictive distributions. We extend the utility function to any proper scoring rule and use Pareto smoothed importance sampling to efficiently compute the required leave-one-out posterior distributions. We compare stacking of predictive distributions to several alternatives: stacking of means, Bayesian model averaging (BMA), Pseudo-BMA, and a variant of Pseudo-BMA that is stabilized using the Bayesian bootstrap. Based on simulations and real-data applications, we recommend stacking of predictive distributions, with bootstrapped-Pseudo-BMA as an approximate alternative when computation cost is an issue.</div><div></div><div></div><div>> Is this advisable or are there better approaches? If you want to do 1 stack, that would work (just keep in mind that you have to switch the mode of each ports from ethernet to stacking mode + a reboot to switch the port mode active. However it depends ... personally if that is your only stack, I'd perhaps separate into at least 2 stacks. The issue is that if you do updates - while you can do staged updates - if anything goes wrong you have to reboot the complete stack. If there is a bug in your stack, all stack members could be affected at once. I wouldn't do it to be honest. While the M4300 have been solid, bugs occur and having all in just 1 big stack, within 1 single logical unit and fault domain, not what I'd want to work with. While there is a standby stack master elected in a stack, crashes can occur. You might also like to idea of testing a new firmware on 1 switch / stack ahead before you ugprade the more critical or even core switch/stack... if you have 1 single stack there is no easy fire testing possible. It looks like the half-width 10G switch could be your core switch? If you added a second half-width switch besides it and make a stack there, then form a stack with the 2 larger ones and just use port-channel pairs between the stacks? It might depend on your actual need of SFP+ ports, however I tend to use cheaper short (usually red just for marking the importance/difference in role) Cat 6 cables as stack ports so the M4300-12X12F in my case and likely in other situations even smaller 8X8F would sufficient?</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Why do people stack?</div><div></div><div>Our recently published study, Household perspectives on cooksstove and fuel stacking: A qualitative study in urban and rural Kenya, delivers new insight on the topic. The study finds that while newly adopted cookstoves displace some of the functions performed by traditional stoves, those traditional stoves are rarely abandoned, primarily because they provide extra burners and allow for simultaneous cooking. Participants expressed the difficulty and time expenditure of relying on a single stove (i.e., one burner), and how adopting new cookstoves helped to overcome that burden.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The other main motivation for stacking was the need to accommodate large pot sizes for warming water or preparing large meals. Energy dense dishes like githeri (a mixture of dried maize and beans) are typically prepared in bulk as a fuel saving measure, and this requires large pots that cannot be accommodated by the modern cookstoves currently in the market. Households therefore resort to traditional cookstoves.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Addressing stacking in clean cooking programs</div><div></div><div>The study reveals that stacking, at least in the study context, is mainly due to technical or design deficiencies that limit the practical utility of modern cookstoves, rather than a cultural attachment to traditional methods.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Designing a cookstove that responds to variations in individual tastes and preferences would be challenging. However, general design solutions can be developed to address the practical requirements identified. For example, cooking solutions could come with multiple burners. Adjustable pot rests could be added to stoves to accommodate large-size pots. High-efficiency cooking appliances such as electric pressure cookers could address the need for fast cooking and the need for bulk cooking of grains to save energy. By better understanding household stacking behavior, clean cooking programs can be designed in such a way to promote user-centered innovations and solutions for better and more sustainable adoption.</div><div></div><div></div><div>I'm using ArcGIS Pro 2.9.3. I have a need to create a label that stacks after the word "to". But the stacking separator only allows one character. If I use the "o" character it splits it everywhere I have an "o" (naturally) and this is not desirable. Screenshot:</div><div></div><div></div><div>Another method besides the label expression that  jcarlson suggested is to use an abbreviation dictionary (translation) to add a stacking character such as a slash, then force stack on that character in the stacking settings.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Ok please note one thing. This may or may not be considered an exploit (and I think amount of stacking matters for the exploit definition of " Exploits are uses and abuses of game mechanics to obtain an unfair advantage over other players") so be warned that you risk a 14-30 day suspension. It is up to you if you risk it.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Using a pin to allow slicing through Z-gaps was one of the keys for me, but in the end, the model is the problem. I'm remodeling now explicitly for printing a stack in PETG at .25mm layers with no support and minimal stacking artifacts. I'm close. fwiw I'm modifying the 3DVerkstan design, North America 6-hole version. More bottom chamfer, nub revisions, and visor profile. Details tomorrow I hope.</div><div></div><div></div><div>In the diagram shown from the stacking presentation LD of the top device is connected to the part's VSS (or cell 16), so the load detect will not work on the top device, it will always be loaded and recovery would need to be from some other mechanism. PACK of the bottom device is connected to the same cell 16 point, here that is about the supply voltage potential for the IC. Load detect for the bottom part is provided by the transistor which senses the PACK- voltage. For the top device any fault recovery should not depend on load detect. Since the part does not sense current that is likely a low risk. For the bottom part it does sense current and could protect from OCD or SCD. The designer may not want to recover into a SCD condition, so load removal could be selected for a recovery condition.</div><div></div><div></div><div>I have trouble stictching my individually stacked photos in Lightroom and other panorama software. At least I could create a panorama using photoshop but I cannot really fix the distortion and as a result of that I end up losing a lot of my pano that is not desired. Lighroom will not even stitch them! Has anyone else had the problem? It is not overlapping issue as I can stitch the individual photos with no stacking.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Hi Guys,</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>I am using a centred navigation (logo on the left, contact button on the right and menu items in the middle).</div><div></div><div>Is there a way to prevent the navigation items from stacking as shown in this screen shot?</div><div></div><div> df19127ead</div>

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Download [BEST] Stacking Zaida Tangredi <zaidatangredi@gmail.com> - 2024-01-21 03:12 -0800

csiph-web