Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.awk > #9954
| From | Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.awk |
| Subject | Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? |
| Date | 2025-04-18 14:24 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vttg9o$30alq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <vt8j5u$1gmdg$1@news.xmission.com> <vt9dre$3t3po$1@dont-email.me> <67f8b7af$0$705$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <vtafa1$vfhn$1@dont-email.me> <vtt813$2ovai$1@dont-email.me> |
On 18.04.2025 12:03, Manuel Collado wrote: > El 11/4/25 a las 9:10, Janis Papanagnou escribió: >> On 11.04.2025 08:33, Aharon Robbins wrote: >>> In article <vt9dre$3t3po$1@dont-email.me>, >>> Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> The feature can be very useful, >>>> but not for the case I was looking for. - Actually, it could have >>>> provided the functionality I was seeking, but since GNU Awk relies >>>> on the GNU regexp functions as they are implemented I cannot expect >>>> that any provided features gets extended by Awk. - If GNU Awk would >>>> have an own RE implementation then we could think about using, e.g., >>>> another array dimension to store the (now only temporary existing, >>>> and generally unavailable) subexpressions. >>> >>> Actually, this is not so trivial. The data structures at the C level >>> as mandated by POSIX are one dimensional; the submatches in parentheses >>> are counted from left to right. There's no way to represent the >>> subexpressions that are under control of interval expressions, which >>> would essentially require a two-dimensional data structure. >> >> Yes, that's why I had thought about a 2-dimensional array [on GNU >> Awk level] so that arr[n][i] for i=1..z would contain the patterns. >> This is what I actually tried with GNU Awk (before I had asked you) >> to see whether there's some undocumented feature. > > A 2-dimensional array is not strictly necessary. It could be possible to > keep the one dimensional array interface and use the same trick for > multidimensional arrays indices in Posix AWK. I.e., return a list of > matched values delimited by SUBSEP. Yes, of course. - My suggestion for using a 2-dimensional array was suggested only because it's IMO simpler to process and access. And given that the considered potentially new functionality would have been non-standard would not hinder that also the match() function (with the new logic) could use GNU Awk's non-standard 2-dimensional arrays. Janis
Back to comp.lang.awk | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Experiences with match() subexpressions? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-10 09:06 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-10 09:09 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-04-10 11:08 +0000
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-10 13:55 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-04-10 14:04 +0000
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:39 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2025-04-11 06:33 +0000
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-11 09:10 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-04-11 08:22 +0000
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Manuel Collado <mcollado2011@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 12:03 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-04-18 12:01 +0000
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-18 14:24 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-04-11 07:40 +0000
The new matcher (Was: Experiences with match() subexpressions?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-04-11 08:57 +0000
Re: The new matcher (Was: Experiences with match() subexpressions?) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-11 15:50 +0200
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-04-11 17:54 +0000
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Ed Morton <mortonspam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 20:07 -0500
Re: Experiences with match() subexpressions? Ed Morton <mortonspam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 12:52 -0500
Nitpicking the code (Was: Experiences with match() subexpressions?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-04-14 18:20 +0000
Re: Nitpicking the code (Was: Experiences with match() subexpressions?) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-14 20:53 +0200
Re: Nitpicking the code (Was: Experiences with match() subexpressions?) Ed Morton <mortonspam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 18:55 -0500
Re: Nitpicking the code (Was: Experiences with match() subexpressions?) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-15 05:35 +0200
csiph-web