Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.awk > #9880
| From | porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.awk |
| Subject | Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations |
| Date | 2024-12-06 13:38 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <viuunp$2c1ev$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vits2o$240vr$1@dont-email.me> <vitvta$24sm3$1@dont-email.me> <viurhe$2bces$1@dont-email.me> |
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
Hey Janis =)
> is my guess correct that you want to create linear equation samples
> to be printed (on paper) and solved? Or is it meant as a programming
> course sample? - My suggestions depend on being one or the other...
Just a quick project, nothing serious. Really just thinking aloud
and hoping some of you might offer up your thoughts. Really great
suggestions, I think I'll add some of your ideas to it in the next
few days.
> I've learned linear equations to contain an additive term, as in
> a x + b = c (i.e. a*x + b == c written as Awk expression),
> so I'd have expected the operator to be '+' or '-' (not '*' or '/').
> (Otherwise, with a*x * b , you could just calculate a*b first and
> a/b respectively, in case of a division a*x / b, before then doing
> the single final lhs/rhs operation. The "both sides" procedures
> you describe in your introductory comment would be unnecessarily
> complicate if you really meant * and / .)
Ahh but I do like the 'spice' of '*' & '/' (see latest iteration below).
But I do wonder about: 5x vs. 5 * x or even (5 * x)... I've read so many
opinions on this matter. If there an offical standard? I dont know.
One older book I have (from 1917!) has 1-2 paragraphs saying 5x without
an intervening * is very bad form & yet, everybody seems to use it, at
least here the USA.
> I wonder about the many temporary variables and technical comments;
> most don't contribute to legibility or clearness and are unnecessary.
> There could be used better naming for the remaining fewer variables.
> It could gain from more structuring, like using a 'random' function
> for integers to make the random expressions simpler.
> Control structure could be simplified, made clearer; do { } while .
> Re-iterating over the stored equations is unnecessary, you can just
> print them.
I know, more clean ups are needed. But the embedded documentation
ought to be included IMO, though, it is terribly messy...
> (I've added code reflecting these suggestions at the end of my post
> in case you'd like to pick an idea or two. I've also changed a few
> more details, just in case you wonder about any differences to the
> original code.)
Yes, certainly, let me study & consider your code & see if I can weave
it into the project. Sounds interesting.
>
> function rnd (n) # n -> 1..n
> {
> return int(rand() * n) + 1
> }
>
> BEGIN {
> srand()
>
> while (++serial_number <= 100) {
> do {
> opc = rand() < 0.5 ? "+" : "-" # choose random operator
> equ = sprintf("%d x %c %d = %d", rnd(20), opc, rnd(20),
> rnd(50))
> } while (equ in equations_store) # avoid duplicates
>
> equations_store [equ] # memorize generated equation
>
> printf("%3d.\t%s\n", serial_number, equ)
> }
> }
>
Yeah I like your thinking, nice & clear. Solid stuff. I'll put some of
this to work during Christmas.
Here's my latest (before I saw your reply). Checkout 'z', sort of like
a gear in a machine yeah? 'n' too. But my imagination is running wild...
BEGIN {
srand() # seed random number generator
# keep generating until we have exactly 100 unique equations
while (u < 100) {
a = int(rand() * 20) + 1 # random value 1 to 20
b = int(rand() * 20) + 1 # random value 1 to 20
c = int(rand() * 50) + 1 # random value 1 to 50
z = substr("*-/+", (++q % 4) + 1, 1) # cycle operators
e = sprintf("%dx %s %d = %d", a, z, b, c) # formatted equation
# store equation in array if it doesn't already exist
if (!(e in equ)) {
equ[e] = 1 # mark element as reserved
u++ # increment u for each unique equation
}
}
# print equations
for (j in equ) printf("%03d. %s\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", ++n, j)
}
# eof
--
:wq
Mike Sanders
Back to comp.lang.awk | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-06 03:46 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-06 04:51 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-06 13:43 +0100
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-06 13:59 +0100
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-07 02:39 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-07 20:42 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-06 13:38 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-06 21:01 +0100
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2024-12-06 23:05 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-07 01:36 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 12:53 -0800
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-06 22:05 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-07 02:06 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-06 22:04 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-07 01:49 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-07 03:21 +0100
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-08 06:40 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:15 +0100
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-09 16:43 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-09 21:10 +0100
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-08 06:06 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-08 07:16 +0000
Re: 100 Random Single Variable Linear Equations porkchop@invalid.foo (Mike Sanders) - 2024-12-08 11:02 +0000
csiph-web