Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.awk > #9784
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.awk |
| Subject | Re: A feature I'd like to see in GAWK... |
| Date | 2024-07-17 12:23 +0000 |
| Organization | The official candy of the new Millennium |
| Message-ID | <v78d34$3iloe$2@news.xmission.com> (permalink) |
| References | <v73pof$3gdp5$2@news.xmission.com> <v76jr4$tu3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
In article <v76jr4$tu3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>, Arti F. Idiot <addr@is.invalid> wrote: >On 7/15/24 12:28 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote: >> I think something like the above would be more in line with the sort of >> things I'd like to see in GAWK. > >+1 ; great idea. Well, I think so. The idea is that you shouldn't have to give up the most intrinsic part of AWK (the pattern/action paradigm) just because your input isn't a named (i.e., on the command line) file. I think of it as "rehabilitating getline". Bringing it back into the fold, rather than exiling it to the sidelines. Note also that my "pipeline" extension only handles the case of a simple process (either input or output - i.e., like AWK's "getline" and "print" with "|" redirection). It doesn't handle any of the other variations of getline/print - such as the ones that interface with network sockets. It would be nice if a built-in approach did those things as well (and better than my extension does). -- The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4 lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL: http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/FreeCollege
Back to comp.lang.awk | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A feature I'd like to see in GAWK... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-07-15 18:28 +0000
Re: A feature I'd like to see in GAWK... Mack The Knife <mack@the-knife.org> - 2024-07-16 14:29 +0000
Which, as noted, is ugly and not AWK (Was: A feature I'd like to see in GAWK...) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-07-16 16:25 +0000
Re: A feature I'd like to see in GAWK... Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-07-16 17:10 +0000
Re: A feature I'd like to see in GAWK... "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid> - 2024-07-16 14:05 -0600
Re: A feature I'd like to see in GAWK... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-07-17 12:23 +0000
Re: A feature I'd like to see in GAWK... Jeremy Brubaker <jbrubake.362@orionarts.invalid> - 2024-07-19 14:26 +0000
csiph-web