Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.awk > #9748
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.awk |
| Subject | No apology needed - your post is fine (Was: One True AWK bug?) |
| Date | 2024-05-22 05:19 +0000 |
| Organization | The official candy of the new Millennium |
| Message-ID | <v2jv8p$19bh7$1@news.xmission.com> (permalink) |
| References | <v2jitt$rp23$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <v2jitt$rp23$1@dont-email.me>, <jeojet@invalid.invalid> wrote: ... >Appologies for the original post; I wasn't aware that it's more or less >the gawk project folks maintaining The One True Awk code and I know not >to post gawk bugs here. No apology needed. It's all good. Perhaps you interpreted the lack of response to your post as some indicator that there was some "topicality" issue with it. Please do not think that. Sometimes, people just don't get around to posting. -- Res ipsa loquitur.
Back to comp.lang.awk | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: One True AWK bug? jeojet@invalid.invalid - 2024-05-22 01:48 +0000 No apology needed - your post is fine (Was: One True AWK bug?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-05-22 05:19 +0000
csiph-web