Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.asm370 > #19
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.asm370 |
| Subject | Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture |
| References | <4f2b127f$0$13510$607ed4bc@cv.net> |
| Message-ID | <0dc2a7f189442e6e4a11ac1587ec4c30@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-02-03 09:53 +0100 |
| Organization | mail2news@dizum.com |
John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> wrote: > On 2012-02-02 19:36:16 +0000, Nomen Nescio said: > > >> > >> got only about 75 times. But we've learned a lot since then. Remember, > >> the z196 may be much faster than a 360/65, but so is an iPhone. Heck, > >> the /screen/ of an iPhone, all by itself, is a bigger, faster computer > >> than a 360/65, and a single USB 2.0 port can outperform all the > >> channels of a maxed-out 65 put together. > > > > Maybe on paper but not in reality. I have seen numerous companies run *all* > > their workload (online and nightly reporting) on a 370 but I haven't seen > > anybody run a business on an iPhone or a USB 2.0 port ;-) > > Yes, and I've seen companies run all their business on a 1401. And I've > worked for a company that, only a few years before, had run all their > business on a 402. We're in furious agreement then? IBM gets the job done, the expensive toys don't. The difference is today people can still run significant corporations on one System Z box, but there is no other single design that can support a business on one box.
Back to comp.lang.asm370 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture David Kanter <dkanter@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 00:37 -0800
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-16 12:35 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture swestin@earthlink.nospam.net - 2012-01-17 12:52 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2012-01-18 04:05 +0000
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture swestin@earthlink.nospam.net - 2012-01-18 09:34 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-01-18 11:31 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2012-02-01 10:59 -0800
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-01 15:15 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2012-02-02 07:43 -0800
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-02 11:45 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-02-02 20:36 +0100
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-02 17:47 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-02-03 09:53 +0100
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-03 11:46 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2012-02-04 14:40 -0800
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-07 15:07 -0500
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-02-04 22:15 +0100
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2012-02-02 18:59 -0800
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2012-02-02 19:03 -0800
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture Waldek Hebisch <hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl> - 2012-02-05 17:35 +0000
Re: Article on IBM's z196 Mainframe Architecture John W Kennedy <jwkenne@attglobal.net> - 2012-02-05 13:45 -0500
csiph-web