Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.ada > #59126
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | fr.comp.lang.ada, comp.lang.ada |
| Subject | Re: Canal+ crash |
| Date | 2024-07-21 21:53 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <v7k01a$8pms$11@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <v7fuqu$3fihj$1@dont-email.me> <v7hmrc$3p5q7$8@dont-email.me> <v7icut$654$1@dont-email.me> <lg3th4F90ggU1@mid.individual.net> <v7ij95$1bo8$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 11:10:06 +0200, J-P. Rosen wrote: > Le 21/07/2024 à 10:00, Niklas Holsti a écrit : > >> But certainly, most attacks on SW have used functional bugs such as >> buffer overflows. > > A problem that has been solved since 1983, and even before (Pascal had > bounds checking). Sigh... Pascal had no checking for memory leaks or double-frees. Rust certainly seems to be a next-generation solution to these sorts of memory problems.
Back to comp.lang.ada | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Canal+ crash Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2024-07-19 23:41 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-20 09:23 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-20 07:43 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-20 11:08 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 01:04 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 09:22 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2024-07-21 11:00 +0300
Re: Canal+ crash "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> - 2024-07-21 11:10 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 11:34 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2024-07-21 13:11 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 21:53 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> - 2024-07-22 08:36 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-23 01:48 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 11:19 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2024-07-21 14:31 +0300
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 18:49 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 21:55 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 21:52 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-22 09:16 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-23 01:49 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-23 09:06 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-23 08:36 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-07-27 23:41 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-10-20 23:30 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-10-24 12:46 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-10-30 09:30 +0100
Re: Canal+ crash Coileán Nioclás Pól de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-11-18 13:34 +0100
Re: Canal+ crash Coileán Nioclás Pól de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-11-18 14:48 +0100
Re: Canal+ crash Coileán Nioclás Pól de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-11-19 15:14 +0100
csiph-web