Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.ada > #59682
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Re: “Is C++ Dead?” |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ada, comp.lang.c++ |
| References | (2 earlier) <10p4rca$mbi0$1@dont-email.me> <10p6ci2$26j2t$1@paganini.bofh.team> <10p6jop$1752c$1@dont-email.me> <10p7bgo$1fpqo$3@dont-email.me> <10p97to$231ct$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <qMVtR.2$TK1.0@fx14.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com |
| Date | 2026-03-16 15:58 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> writes: >On 15/03/2026 22:23, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 15:37:59 +0000, Tristan Wibberley wrote: >> >>> I suspect that once upon a time they used linker+c but boilerplate >>> reduction and the gradual obsolescence of linker scripts to control >>> memory layout lead to C++ and custom layout tools. > >eh, well, they're were still there internal to the build processes when >I was working in automotive but they were often machine-translations >from other sources, even via attributes and toolchain flags (because >command-orientation is a common human trait). > There is still a lot of standalone (sans-OS) code written in both C and C++, and linker scripts are far from obsolete.
Back to comp.lang.ada | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-12 19:46 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-14 23:35 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-15 13:35 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-15 15:37 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-15 17:58 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-15 22:23 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-16 15:34 +0000
Re: Re: “Is C++ Dead?” scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-03-16 15:58 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-17 00:02 +0000
csiph-web