Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.ada > #59686
| From | George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.ada |
| Subject | Re: “Is C++ Dead?” |
| Date | 2026-03-16 23:00 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <p1ehrkd48p66db001dvcfdcp0op4jprjqv@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <10olsom$20n6b$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <10oni1q$3p6qk$1@dont-email.me> <10p70c5$27ou9$1@paganini.bofh.team> <3k4grk9f7is5vl0hjsccdiqttrdvh145c4@4ax.com> <10p9d9n$2hl9e$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 17:06:01 -0000 (UTC), Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> wrote: >In comp.lang.ada George Neuner <gneuner2@Comcast.net> wrote: >|---------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"If you want to know what Erik Naggum thought, there's an archive of | >|his comp.lang.lisp postings at https://xach.com/naggum/articles/. "| >|---------------------------------------------------------------------| > >This is another example where George Neuner taught me via another of >his insights. Thanks! I suspect that HTTPS://Xach.com/naggum/articles >does not archive all of Naggum's comp.lang.lisp postings which were >marked with an anti-archiving header. >(S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!) I don't know that the Naggum archive is complete, but I am reasonably sure that its time span is correct. I began reading C.L.L in the early 90s. My first memory of Erik was mid/late 90s, and he stopped posting a couple of years before he passed in 2009. Erik really didn't post a whole lot (compared to some others). More typically he would make a few long posts, and then you'd hear nothing more from him until some new topic caught his attention. These are some more extensive C.L.L archives that can provide context for Erik's posts. Again, I can't vouch for completeness. 1986 - 2017 (mbox format files) https://github.com/noend2/comp.lang.lisp-archive 2003 - 2020 (mbox format file) https://archive.org/details/FULL-USENET-BACKUP-2020-Oct-comp.lang.lisp.202216.mbox.7z 1986 - 2022 (web UI - no apparent way to search) https://usenetarchives.com/threads.php?id=comp.lang.lisp note: C.L.L began in 1986. IMHO there hasn't been much substantive discussion in recent years, so the mbox files cover the vast majority of everything you'd want to read anyway. YMMV.
Back to comp.lang.ada | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-15 19:13 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-15 19:40 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-15 21:15 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2026-03-15 18:15 -0500
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2026-03-15 17:33 -0500
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-16 00:28 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-03-17 00:52 +0800
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2026-03-16 10:31 -0400
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-03-16 17:56 +0200
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-16 17:06 +0000
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2026-03-16 23:00 -0400
Re: “Is C++ Dead?” Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-03-18 00:20 +0000
csiph-web