Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.internet.services.wiki > #4

Re: One admin who should be desysoped, and five others that perhaps should be if they do not respond to anything but legal threats.

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lewin Bormann wrote:
 > Bohgosity BumaskiL <brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> wrote on Freitag
 > 20 Mai 2011 01:45:
 >
 >> I do not see that [[user:moonriddengirl|moonridden girl]] haz the
 >> right to delete notes on other user's talk pages that are in my
 >> defence, and that attack no one.
 >
 > I think so, too. Nobody has anywhere any rights to change notes on
 > any talk pages, not?
 >
 > LB

My personal rules varied from that. For example, there was one
guy who clearly believed that a good offense was the best
defense, so I wanted to end the conversation. I did. I condensed
the whole conversation into a one line summary of the answer to
my question on HIZ talk page, directing the conversation closed.
I treated my talk page like an e-mail INBOX. My deletion of your
words did not indicate acceptance or denial.

There was one instance where I deleted someone's comment from
someone else's INBOX. It did not happen again. There was a
useful instance, where I put titles on and organized topics on
the talk page for prion. I should've apologized to the guy whose
comments I deleted, and it was easier to leave the whole
project, which I did not formally study, anyway. The conflict
was on whether neurology and neuroscience were exact synonyms,
or whether someone could come up with rules to distinguish them
(and if not then neuroscience should disappear and neurology
take its place).

I would expect an admin to know better than to even try deleting
someone else's comments in someone else's INBOX. One rule for
me; another for an admin.
_______
http://ecn.ab.ca/~brewhaha/ BrewJay's Babble Bin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: http://ecn.ab.ca/~brewhaha/gpg/Keyprint_Biometric.mp3.pgp

iQCVAwUBTeMTOh47apzXdID2AQJZlwP+LF1JwpxAjffqZ34Bzt80eSrLYlCDcs0x
R+8798CWCBMx4y2CF/TNLpf5mLWebgSwR+y5AYCJS5uGc36dTXSp6+JQY2Cv73q2
PD0uy4mnzQ16oRlhw9NgrZRo5s4Z84ZvZo+7IFRrN/lqFrUtGaA18mnkGTpmlaE7
n0oM53hPQFs=
=9HE8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to comp.internet.services.wiki | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

One admin who should be desysoped, and five others that perhaps should be if they do not respond to anything but legal threats. "Bohgosity BumaskiL" <brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> - 2011-05-19 17:45 -0600
  Re: One admin who should be desysoped, and five others that perhaps should be if they do not respond to anything but legal threats. Lewin Bormann <mail@example.com> - 2011-05-28 14:34 +0200
    Re: One admin who should be desysoped, and five others that perhaps should be if they do not respond to anything but legal threats. "Bohgosity BumaskiL" <brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> - 2011-05-29 21:51 -0600
    Re: One admin who should be desysoped, and five others that perhaps should be if they do not respond to anything but legal threats. Bohgosity BumaskiL <brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> - 2011-05-30 15:50 -0600
    Re: One admin who should be desysoped, and five others that perhaps should be if they do not respond to anything but legal threats. "Bohgosity BumaskiL" <brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> - 2011-06-20 19:13 -0600

csiph-web