Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.infosystems.gemini > #643
| From | news@zzo38computer.org.invalid |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.infosystems.gemini |
| Subject | Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols |
| Date | 2024-03-17 15:42 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1710714649.bystand@zzo38computer.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <ut3h6r$2pgob$1@dont-email.me> <87jzm26ixq.fsf@ross154.client.etacassiopeiae.net> <baf41084-dd28-5bdf-6d2a-2dd0d23febf2@example.net> <1710635809.bystand@zzo38computer.org> <eb544742-8be9-eeab-8793-1c3eead680ba@example.net> |
D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > I like the idea of seeing goher and gemini as complements and not > competitors. Is gemini backwards compatible with gopher by design, or is > the idea to "pull away" from gopher eventually? Gemini is a different protocol and not compatible with Gopher, although it is possible for a browser to implement both protocols, and many do. They are not mutually exclusive. -- Don't laugh at the moon when it is day time in France.
Back to comp.infosystems.gemini | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Small web protocols / alternative protocols news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-15 16:47 -0700
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols Arkholt <arkholt@gmail.com> - 2024-03-16 07:19 +0000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-16 10:28 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-16 16:29 -0700
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols gaussianblue <gaussianblue@asymptote.invalid> - 2024-03-17 08:55 +0000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-17 18:54 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-18 11:15 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-03-17 11:01 +1000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-17 03:48 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2024-03-17 16:13 +0000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-02 07:21 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols Chris Narkiewicz <hello@ezaquarii.com> - 2024-03-16 20:05 +0000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-03-16 21:55 +0100
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2024-03-16 21:44 +0000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-03-17 10:42 +0100
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols Chris Narkiewicz <hello@ezaquarii.com> - 2024-03-17 14:24 +0000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2024-03-17 14:29 +0000
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-16 18:37 -0700
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-03-17 10:44 +0100
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-03-17 16:19 +0100
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-03-17 18:24 +0100
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-17 15:42 -0700
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-16 14:08 -0700
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-26 02:21 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-26 02:23 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-26 08:06 +0042
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-03-27 10:50 +0042
csiph-web