Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!193.252.117.184.MISMATCH!feeder.news.orange.fr!not-for-mail
Organization: AW4SiS
Subject: the graphics or its association with the painter
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.rendering.renderman
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:32:29 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <47ac1d9@talkway.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24
From: sylvie <sylvielovric@yahoo.fr>
Lines: 9
NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Mar 2013 10:32:26 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.145.36.240
X-Trace: 1362562346 reader.news.orange.fr 1408 92.145.36.240:6803
X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr
Xref: csiph.com comp.graphics.rendering.renderman:32

Greetings.

Prior to the debate about the graphics without the painter pretreatment, 
someone may define the quality management of the painter simultaneously;
As a matter of fact, Before analyzing the graphics, it should be useful to imagine the treatment 
of the painter with collaborative contributions;
would you mind explaining how to imagine the graphics outsourcing and the relationship with the painter quality management?

Bye