X-Received: by 10.99.126.1 with SMTP id z1mr6958149pgc.87.1499965220497; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!188no640077itx.0!news-out.google.com!q47ni5203qtb.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news3 From: "F. Russell" Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot Subject: Are Space Flights Always Limited to the Solar System Plane? Date: 13 Jul 2017 16:59:17 GMT Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 Lines: 16 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: p982300328a2b3302122c6c55696a59a65004f7abdad6963d.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Pan/0.141 (Tarzan's Death; 168b179 tag: PAN_0_141) X-Received-Bytes: 1276 X-Received-Body-CRC: 587048318 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Xref: csiph.com comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot:3690 A spacecraft launched from earth will have a velocity component equal to the earth's orbital velocity around the sun (30 km/sec). To place this spacecraft in an orbit perpendicular to the plane of the solar system would require that this velocity component be overcome. This would require a LOT of fuel and it seems that for this reason such a perpendicular orbit would be unfeasible. Is this correct? Are all spacecraft then limited practically to orbits that are within the plane of the solar system? A separate question would be the reason why an orbit perpendicular to the solar system plane would be useful.