Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #3599
| From | Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' |
| Date | 2017-03-27 22:15 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <obbrte$tvn$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <oapaur$q4d$1@dont-email.me> <ob32kh$usr$1@solani.org> <ob94nq$vrh$1@dont-email.me> <ob9q9a$jc4$1@solani.org> <oba9kq$ppi$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 27.03.2017 um 08:00 schrieb Ethan A Merritt: > Karl Ratzsch wrote: >> Not much of a downside, but what about "+" ? Will it use trange now? >> That's a bit strong, re backwards compatibility. ? > > Good question. > > Although the syntax required is not quite the same as for '++' > you can already effectively do that like this: > > set xrange [1:100] > plot sample [t=10:20] '+' using (t):(sin(t)) Ja, that's definitely sufficient, and probably better than reusing the parametric 't' variable outside of it's original scope. For "++", this plot sample [var1=10:20] [var2=-3:3] '++' using ... would be my favourite (nice not having to use the cryptic $n's, ranges can be varied for subplots), but it's probably heck to get the parser to recognise it. One "sample" keyword demands for one following range specifer, a second one might not be so easy to catch. ?
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-03-20 08:36 +0100
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Ethan A Merritt <EAMerritt@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 09:39 -0700
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-03-20 18:56 +0100
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Ethan A Merritt <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-03-20 12:36 -0700
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Ethan A Merritt <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-03-20 12:38 -0700
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-03-24 13:15 +0100
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Ethan A Merritt <EAMerritt@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 12:30 -0700
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-03-27 03:35 +0200
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Ethan A Merritt <EAMerritt@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 23:00 -0700
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-03-27 22:15 +0200
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-04-02 19:02 +0200
Re: set range for second independent variable in special file '++' Ethan A Merritt <EAMerritt@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 22:09 -0700
csiph-web