Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #3546
| From | Ethan A Merritt <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: Ignore missing data in the desired way |
| Date | 2017-01-20 10:19 -0800 |
| Organization | gnuplot development |
| Message-ID | <o5tk9d$9f4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <4eb939ed-8e0f-45aa-a163-d1714b70536a@googlegroups.com> <o5sqtt$ese$1@solani.org> |
Karl Ratzsch wrote:
> Am 20.01.2017 um 10:35 schrieb u.gotzes@gmail.com:
>>
>> I can't get the script below to do what I want, namely make gnuplot draw
>> continuous lines between the respective datasets "Yes", "No" and "Maybe".
>> Can anybody help?
>>
>
> (simplified example)
> set dataf missing '?'
> $dat << EOD
> No Maybe
> 0 2
> 1 ?
> 2 1
> 3 2
> 4 ?
> 5 9
> 6 ?
> ? 1
> 8 2
> 9 5
> EOD
>
> plot "$dat" using "No":"Maybe" w lp # missing dp are invalid
> pause -1
> plot "$dat" using 1:2 w lp # works
>
>
>
> There are few connecting lines and no bezier curve, because an
> invalid datapoint breaks those connections.
>
> Aaand you know about that and "set datafile missing '?'", meaning
> the connections should not be broken.
>
> I find that it works if I use column numbers instead of header
> strings in the "using" specifier. Looks like a bug to me.
Version 5 was supposed to remove the difference between
using N and using ($N)
but it seems that this is a case where they are still treated
differently, as they were in earlier gnuplot versions.
So on the one hand it's always been this way, but on the other hand
it was intended to change. Let's call it a bug.
Note that using ($N) and using (column(N)) and using (column("head"))
all share the same input processing. So this bug is not specific
to column headers.
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Ignore missing data in the desired way u.gotzes@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 01:35 -0800
Re: Ignore missing data in the desired way Karl Ratzsch <mail.kfr@gmx.net> - 2017-01-20 12:05 +0100
Re: Ignore missing data in the desired way Ethan A Merritt <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-20 10:19 -0800
Re: Ignore missing data in the desired way u.gotzes@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 12:49 -0800
Re: Ignore missing data in the desired way sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-21 16:26 -0800
csiph-web