Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news-peer.in.tum.de!news.belwue.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: "Charles T. Smith" Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot Subject: Re: fatal precision problem in gnuplot or fatal operator incompetence? Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:45:56 +0200 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <87haw4lydm.fsf@wivenhoe.ul.ie> NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b07837f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: online.de 1335624365 6995 91.7.131.127 (28 Apr 2012 14:46:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:46:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 In-Reply-To: <87haw4lydm.fsf@wivenhoe.ul.ie> Xref: csiph.com comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot:1062 On 04/28/12 16:33, Brendan Halpin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28 2012, 3031-866 wrote: > >> On 04/28/12 12:25, Charles T. Smith wrote: >>> Why does: >>> >>> plot [0:1000] sin(x) >>> >>> seem to be modulated with what appears to be a sine wave? >> >> >> Could this have anything to do with the fact that when I plot: >> >> >> gnuplot> set parametric >> gnuplot> set size square >> gnuplot> r(t) = 1 - exp(-0.25*t/pi) # the radius as function of t >> gnuplot> plot [0:25*pi][-1.1:1.1][-1.1:1.1] r(t)*cos(t), r(t)*sin(t) >> >> (from Gnuplot In Action, by Philipp K. Janert) >> >> I get a spiral of straight lines rather than a curving spiral, as shown >> in the book? > > Yes, exactly so. Insert "set samples 10000" and you'll get your spiral. > >> >> Is this a reason to be using 64 bit linux? > > No. > > Brendan > Thank you for the complete and concise answers.