Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: sfeam Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot Subject: Re: Transparent fillstyle for boxes with postscript Followup-To: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:59:34 -0700 Organization: gnuplot development team Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: sfeam@users.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="joalffpZlyHxFtpFd/PRrw"; logging-data="19655"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/p4dGBYFZlllRYTu1/yLa7" User-Agent: KNode/4.4.3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:UFD0GuQ+qZPyMSZDcni5+znJF6c= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot:259 Michael Hofmann wrote: > Am 13.04.2011 20:13, schrieb sfeam: >> Michael Hofmann wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the postscript terminal (version 4.4 patchlevel 0) does not seems to be >>> able to create "boxes" with transparent fill style >> >> The PostScript language itself does not support transparency. > > OK, but why *is* transparency working for "filledcurves" with > PostScript, but *not* for "boxes"? I would expect it works for both, or > for none. The same PostScript commands are used for both plot styles. Perhaps you are noticing a difference between pattern-fill and solid-fill?