Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.dcom.cabling > #126
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "ps56k" <pschuman_no5pam_m3@interserv.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.internet.wireless, comp.dcom.cabling, comp.dcom.lans.ethernet |
| Subject | Re: Shielded RJ-45: Internal vs External Ground? |
| Date | Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:34:17 -0600 |
| Organization | me |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <m93oee$tdn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <p0h0bapljsh0qags00cfhv45cvq0fvj2oq@4ax.com> <1de1ba98b5a4o1sun0bcing0hgbsrv5t92@4ax.com> <vmc2bapjnpb31q1isbqak03mijt93o5k27@4ax.com> <vjq2bah1h654phjj01khbmi3t639e7svmb@4ax.com> |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:33:50 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="66df835e82f4b7980cd79cc84b4f729e"; logging-data="30135"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lrp0aiBU1qaiQ5rHqBoKi" |
| X-MimeOLE | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 |
| X-Vipre-Scanned | 00656F42008D520065708F |
| X-RFC2646 | Format=Flowed; Original |
| X-Newsreader | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 |
| X-Unsent | 1 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:gr8DCbRkhpN39JJXZex0P5bG5vM= |
| X-Priority | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority | Normal |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.dcom.cabling:126 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet:176 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
X-posting - for those in the Cabling world - "Jeff Liebermann" <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote in message news:vjq2bah1h654phjj01khbmi3t639e7svmb@4ax.com... > On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 09:45:52 -0500, "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> > wrote: > >>Self-serving promo for their house brand? That was my kneejerk >>reaction.... but now I know that there are several threads in the >>Ubiquiti fora that make it pretty clear that electrostatic discharge is >>a consideration. For example: http://tinyurl.com/m5vttf3 > > Static buildup on metal structures is only a problem when the humidity > is quite low. My guess(tm) is 20% or less. That's not a problem in > the bay area, and certainly not in a wet marine environment. > > Shielding does do well for EMI/RFI protection. If you're near a > transmitter of any significant power level, I would use shielded > cable. Even so, I doubt if it would do any good because most of the > Ubiquiti radios use unshielded plastic case. > > Note that there are aftermarket products that provide shielding if > needed. > <http://www.rfelements.com/en/products/shields/rockshield/> > If you're using it for cellular backhaul, it's probably a good idea. > > > -- > Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com > 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com > Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com > Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Back to comp.dcom.cabling | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Shielded RJ-45: Internal vs External Ground? "ps56k" <pschuman_no5pam_m3@interserv.com> - 2015-01-13 12:34 -0600
csiph-web