Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.dcom.cabling > #144

Re: RJ48X keystone?

Show all headers | View raw

On Friday, March 5, 2004 at 3:49:04 PM UTC+1, Dmitri <Cabling-Design.com> wrote:
> That was RJ31X
> -- 
> Dmitri Abaimov, RCDD
> http://www.cabling-design.com
> Cabling Forum, color codes, pinouts and other useful online resources for
> premises wiring users and professionals
> http://www.cabling-design.com/resources/documents/residential.html
> Residential Cabling Guide
> "glen herrmannsfeldt" <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote in message
> news:JsS1c.45497$PR3.927516@attbi_s03...
> > Bill wrote:
> >
> > > "David Lesher" <wb8...@panix.com> wrote in message
> > > news:c23tvg$r9v$2...@reader1.panix.com...
> >
> > >>Does there exist a RJ48X keystone to fit in the usual faceplate?
> >
> > > To the best of my knowledge no one makes an RJ48X in a keystone format.
> If
> > > you really need the transfer contacts that the 48X configuration
> provides
> > > for T1 applications.
> > > http://www.arcelect.com/RJ48C_and_RJ48S_8_position_jack_.htm
> >
> > So that is what they are for.
> >
> > I have seen this used in burglar alarms, where the alarm system
> > plugs into an RJ48X, such that if you unplug it the phones in the
> > house still work. If the alarm system wants to call in, it can
> > disconnect the phones.
> >
> > -- glen
> >
hi

Back to comp.dcom.cabling | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: RJ48X keystone? Karen OMEYOMA-AKAKABOTA <omeyoma-akakabota.796@jesuitmemorial.org> - 2020-09-21 01:57 -0700

csiph-web