Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.databases.xbase.fox > #73
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, comp.programming, comp.lang.c, comp.databases.xbase.fox, comp.lang.clipper, comp.databases.xbase.fox |
| Subject | Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" |
| Date | 2017-06-07 22:49 +0800 |
| Organization | Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong |
| Message-ID | <oh93ji$o18$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <oh1drl$stf$3@dont-email.me> <6d656aa9-f2a8-46a0-86fc-950e3d495fa9@googlegroups.com> <oh2klr$e8s$5@dont-email.me> <oh5c35$edr$1@pcls7.std.com> <59ucjc9fk7fosbrf8mkc2r8rj1j5ucfeqb@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 6/6/2017 5:43 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> Was the word supposed to be "coffee" by chance? "Covfefe" is two typos >> different from "coffee", and the typos could have been caused by either >> not enough or way too much coffee. > > It was supposed to be "coverage." > "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" It's still a better explanation than "coverage". I think it's called Hamming Distance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Back to comp.databases.xbase.fox | Previous | Next | Find similar
Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 22:49 +0800
csiph-web