Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mladen Gogala Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql Subject: Re: why is postgresql better than mariadb? Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 08:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <485d489a-e7a5-4885-9c7d-2d983efef307@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 08:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e4f8def8fb90dfd954091bdd9211c78d"; logging-data="13388"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hWpLdTD0w5jdTWeB7Kq+3" User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cU1peZ/sRwOBwWlKWVWvv/BOfBo= Xref: csiph.com comp.databases.postgresql:489 On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:20:09 -0700, johannes falcone wrote: > why? It isn't. There is a reason why PostgreSQL has been largely ignored by business community. Actually, there are several reasons: - No hints - Partitioning is a joke: no global indexes, optimizer problems. - No built-in parallelism. PostgreSQL is simply inadequate. -- Mladen Gogala The Oracle Whisperer http://mgogala.byethost5.com