X-Received: by 10.68.215.65 with SMTP id og1mr1862314pbc.3.1418182376172; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:32:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.20.108 with SMTP id 99mr1918qgi.15.1418182375854; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:32:55 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!h15no16529837igd.0!news-out.google.com!r1ni15qat.1!nntp.google.com!s7no5357942qap.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:32:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.6.147.89; posting-account=VJwTTQoAAABKqOMAgvkZcRCnb3dmjtF- NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.6.147.89 References: <8abcf0be-97d0-4c11-869f-303f7e4bc1f7@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: will cassandra, riak, or hypertable obsolete pg? From: johannes falcone Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 03:32:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.databases.postgresql:617 On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 4:14:50 PM UTC-5, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > johannes falcone writes: > > why not? > > Not the same trade offs. > > -- > Dimitri Fontaine > PostgreSQL DBA, Architecte both are databases..