Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Hans Castorp Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:57:11 +0200 Lines: 9 Message-ID: <96j8s5Ft0hU1@mid.individual.net> References: <1308640710.210659@proxy.dienste.wien.at><1308738638.232318@proxy.dienste.wien.at> <1308911383.819034@proxy.dienste.wien.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 8+iy8rR79OjvjE2NmkEoLw3+1HALJqw8NkH01g05SjhMamb3o= Cancel-Lock: sha1:VFyjSvY2BblZ/kgZPW/SlgeDZVo= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <1308911383.819034@proxy.dienste.wien.at> Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.databases.postgresql:149 Laurenz Albe wrote on 24.06.2011 12:29: > You make the point that because of VACUUM there is nothing compared to > Oracle's ROWID. PG's ctid is very similar as Oracle's ROWID (as similar as things like that can be between completely different architectures)