Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.databases.mysql Subject: Re: Can MySql database store images? Followup-To: comp.databases.mysql Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:32:41 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <55md88-7pb.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <68mf88-4l5.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="PfteNUsu9gxPcp7CbOxONA"; logging-data="8709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/22lyQHrpunqn251TwXK9raqfld0zDNYI=" User-Agent: KNode/4.4.6 Cancel-Lock: sha1:BBfPc2NllPVNDCCKsOZJ6bwmt8c= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.databases.mysql:698 Norman Peelman wrote: > The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> Norman Peelman wrote: >>> Doug Miller wrote: >>> Dump file (w/images) = 29.8MB >>> Dump file zipped = 1.7MB >>> >>> >> It is seldom possible to compress images more than they are already >> compressed. >> >> So I still think you have made a mistake. > > It's a dump file, the images are in textual format (base64?) not > binary. > Yebbut: if the total images are 460*5.3kB = 2.4MB of pure image data. You wouldn't normally expect those to be very comprssible by ZIp from JPGs, especially if you have already gone through another encoding (ie ASCII). It's not impossible but it seems a bit close... -- Tim Watts