Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!gregory.BNet.hr!not-for-mail From: "m" Newsgroups: comp.databases.ms-sqlserver Subject: Re: Increase tempdb database, SQL 2008 R2 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:43:48 +0100 Organization: B.net Hrvatska d.o.o. Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.139.114.5 X-Trace: gregory.bnet.hr 1324557829 2296 83.139.114.5 (22 Dec 2011 12:43:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@globalnet.hr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:43:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.databases.ms-sqlserver:885 Thanks. We have 8GB RAM on that SQL server. What do you think if we limit SQL memory to 6GB, would there be any improvment on server performance? "m" wrote in message news:jcuri7$e6j$1@gregory.bnet.hr... > Thank you. > > Regards > > "Erland Sommarskog" wrote in message > news:Xns9FC363373690EYazorman@127.0.0.1... >>m (web12master@gmail.com) writes: >>> We have bad performanse on that SQL server, I noticed that tempdb is >>> smaller than it should be (producer of software we use on that sql >>> server advice to have inital min 100MB of tempdb) >>> >>> Now initial size of tempdb is 8MB with 10% of autogrowth and size is >>> 90MB >>> and application database is about 4GB. >>> >>> I'm planing to put inital 200MB with autogrowth 25% >>> What do you think? >> >> Even without instant file initialization, clearing 200 MB of disk is not >> that painful. Go for it. >> >> -- >> Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se >> >> Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx >> Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at >> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx > >