Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1504

Re: doubt

Newsgroups	comp.databases.ms-sqlserver
Date	2013-05-30 15:10 -0700
References	<06898a81-8fb2-417f-9b1c-4cc43489b290@googlegroups.com> <98b66c46-8c39-42b2-8ecd-841a633df8f1@googlegroups.com> <XnsA1D0EB5A06284Yazorman@127.0.0.1>
Message-ID	<d31d7f55-1e5e-4fec-a53c-dd983edf0280@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: doubt
From	rja.carnegie@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday, 30 May 2013 22:08:09 UTC+1, Erland Sommarskog  wrote:
> Your question was brief, my answer was equally brief.
> But ultimately, the users of the system are the one 
> who decides whether the system is fast enough. And if
> it is not, they will complain.

Users, and I speak as one, can be trained to accept 
appalling standards of service.  We've got an enterprise 
reporting system that /usually/ returns an error instead 
of a report.

I suppose the technical answer to the question is in 
terms of the activity level on the server - where a lot 
less than 100% still counts as under stress - or on
the duration between starting an operation and 
completing it.  But what can you do ab‰ut it? I suppose
stop running your personal Bitcoin software on 
the server...

Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

doubt SUBBU N <nsubbu1986@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 23:06 -0700
  Re: doubt Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2013-05-29 07:32 +0000
  Re: doubt SUBBU N <nsubbu1986@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 02:55 -0700
    Re: doubt Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2013-05-30 23:08 +0200
      Re: doubt rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2013-05-30 15:10 -0700
        Re: doubt Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2013-05-31 07:45 +0000
  Re: doubt Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 10:18 -0700
    Re: doubt Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2013-06-04 22:24 +0200
      Re: doubt Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 13:34 -0700

csiph-web