X-Received: by 10.224.173.4 with SMTP id n4mr11241909qaz.3.1377131092431; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:24:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.102.97 with SMTP id fn1mr555827igb.16.1377131092235; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!fx3no3932142qab.0!news-out.google.com!c19ni456qak.0!nntp.google.com!fx3no3932136qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.databases.ms-sqlserver Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:24:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=216.14.58.122; posting-account=PG2dbQkAAADVILsQ0GhgAM6hZK18SIjs NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.14.58.122 References: <1c953ac5-0c12-4cfe-9c43-b688af51846e@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <58e3fe4e-7e8d-4e9f-93ff-06ee37346b83@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: pitfalls of accessing linked server over WAN From: migurus Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:24:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.databases.ms-sqlserver:1548 > > you should test that your code behaves as expected. For a simple procedure > > like this one, I would recommend that you open a direct connection > > from the application instead. > > > > > > -- > > Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Unfortunately we can not modify app