Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1746

Re: power loss DB corruption

Newsgroups	comp.databases.ms-sqlserver
Date	2014-04-27 09:08 -0700
References	<ljd3mq$5vr$1@solani.org> <XnsA31A7E40D77CDYazorman@127.0.0.1> <cc8d3248-3d71-4330-bfc7-5fce19b693df@googlegroups.com> <XnsA31AB9D81E3BYazorman@127.0.0.1>
Message-ID	<4f6411dd-c6d4-4566-bf75-6adad9c9e50f@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: power loss DB corruption
From	bradbury9 <ray.bradbury9@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

El viernes, 25 de abril de 2014 18:16:09 UTC+2, Erland Sommarskog  escribió:
> bradbury9 (ray.bradbury9@gmail.com) writes:
> 
> > Should not happen if Sql Server is full ACID compilant and it claims to
> 
> > be since SQL Server 2010. 
> 
> 
> 
> SQL Server 2010?
> 
> 
> 
> Anyway, if you pull the powercord in the middle of a big filecopy operation,
> 
> and you run CHKDISK after the operation, are you surprised if errors are 
> 
> reported?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, esquel@sommarskog.se

If fact transaction should be commited after the write in done. In that case the chkdisk should raise no problems which seems to not be the case

Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

power loss DB corruption Hendrik van der Heijden <hvdh@gmx.de> - 2014-04-25 09:43 +0200
  Re: power loss DB corruption Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2014-04-25 12:24 +0200
    Re: power loss DB corruption bradbury9 <ray.bradbury9@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 04:42 -0700
      Re: power loss DB corruption Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2014-04-25 18:16 +0200
        Re: power loss DB corruption bradbury9 <ray.bradbury9@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 09:08 -0700
  Re: power loss DB corruption rja.carnegie@gmail.com - 2014-04-25 06:54 -0700
  Re: power loss DB corruption Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2014-07-02 22:28 +0100

csiph-web