X-Received: by 10.182.95.68 with SMTP id di4mr1783462obb.4.1390955265243; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:27:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.93.109 with SMTP id c100mr62281qge.16.1390955265132; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:27:45 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-01.inet.qwest.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.111.MISMATCH!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!c10no4485456igq.0!news-out.google.com!s3ni162qas.0!nntp.google.com!k15no9393126qaq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.databases.ms-sqlserver Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:27:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.40.21.115; posting-account=dELd-gkAAABehNzDMBP4sfQElk2tFztP NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.40.21.115 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <041bda4e-289e-413e-b042-661856b19d13@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Get Error when I start SQL Server Management Studio for SQL Server 2008 From: rja.carnegie@gmail.com Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:27:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 2246 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3037692934 Xref: csiph.com comp.databases.ms-sqlserver:1648 On Tuesday, 28 January 2014 20:18:31 UTC, Erland Sommarskog wrote: > Tony Johansson (johansson.andersson@telia.com) writes: > > Here is all the files that belong to SQl Server 2008 > > Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 10.0.1600.22 > > ((SQL_PreRelease).080709-1414 ) > > That's the RTM version of SQL Server Management Studio. I would suggest > that you start with installing the most recent Service Pack for > SQL Server. > > Although the error suggests that the file > C:\Users\YourUser\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL > Server\100\Tools\Shell\RegSrvr.xml > > has been damaged in some way. If Tony renames that file - while Management Studio isn't running - would you expect then that Management Studio will run better, and will re-create a new version of the file - having "forgotten" any SQL Server registered with it? Or will it go badly wrong? Of course he'll need to have any passwords required to register the server in Management Studio again. I say rename the file, in order to be able to put it back where it was, if that is necessary.