Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.databases.ms-access > #806
| From | <martin@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-access |
| References | <49923$4d9833db$5356be6c$3062@cache120.multikabel.net> <in9pv5$sf$1@dont-email.me> <2b3a7$4d987872$5356be6c$10034@cache120.multikabel.net> <983ip6p35eoehndp87ce9d4buquchspd4n@4ax.com> |
| Subject | Re: Saving memory |
| Date | 2011-04-04 16:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <96c51$4d99db62$5356be6c$3385@cache100.multikabel.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | Multikabel |
> Ah, so you're surpised the BE is now 1.6 Mb smaller. You expected a > smaller decrease in size? Yes. But I'm happy with it :) > Thus I would expect 10K records at 4 Kb each to take 4 Mb in the old > format. I see. Since you don't need the double filenaming (with the # separator) if you use a text field, that would save about 2 MB, which is not that far from 1,6 MB. Thanks, Martin "Tony Toews" schreef in bericht news:983ip6p35eoehndp87ce9d4buquchspd4n@4ax.com... On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:38:51 +0200, <martin@hotmail.com> wrote: >The hyperlinkfield wás indexed though along with an ID field and so is the >text field now with the same ID field. I'm guessing the extra text of the >hyperlink took a lot of extra storage room. Ah, so you're surpised the BE is now 1.6 Mb smaller. You expected a smaller decrease in size? Hyperlink fields are stored similar to memo and OLE fields in that each field with data becomnes a separate 4 kb page. (At a minimum. Obviously a memo or OLE field could be larger as well as a hyperlink field. Although that might be a rather long hyperlink. ) Thus I would expect 10K records at 4 Kb each to take 4 Mb in the old format. But then 10K records with 255 bytes each might take 255 Kb extra space. Although that's not at all an accurate space calculation because multiple records can fit in a 4 Kb page and thus many of those now text fields might've fit in the current page without any problems. But my WAG calculations are clearly wrong in some respect. I'm not quite sure why but you get the idea. Did all 10K records have a hyperlink or maybe only abuot 1.6/4 or about 40%? Tony -- Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP Tony's Main MS Access pages - http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/ For a convenient utility to keep your users FEs and other files updated see http://www.autofeupdater.com/
Back to comp.databases.ms-access | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Saving memory <martin@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 10:46 +0200
Re: Saving memory "Douglas J Steele" <NOSPAM_djsteele@NOSPAM_gmail.com> - 2011-04-03 08:42 -0400
Re: Saving memory <martin@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 15:38 +0200
Re: Saving memory Tony Toews <ttoews@telusplanet.net> - 2011-04-03 18:22 -0600
Re: Saving memory <martin@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-04 16:53 +0200
csiph-web