Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.databases.filemaker > #3520
| From | Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.filemaker |
| Subject | Re: formula question, nested positions |
| Date | 2022-06-03 19:33 +1200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <t7cdg9$18a8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnt9eqvv.3rf.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de> <t7c5sg$f9f$1@gioia.aioe.org> <slrnt9j91b.pgb.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de> |
On 2022-06-03 06:03:22 +0000, Martin Τrautmann said: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 17:23:28 +1200, Helpful Harry wrote: > >> b) The next Middle function is missing the +1, like in a), >> to skip over the first : after the hours. Adding in that +1 >> means it is >> Left(Middle(t;Position(t;":";1;1)+1;99); >> Position(Middle(t;Position(t;":";1;1)#+1#;99)&":"; ":";1;1)-1) >> Entering 12:34:56 then return 34 instead of empty text. > > omg, yes - so it did not take the 34:56 part, but used :34:56 instead. > Now I see why it always failed, since it found the initial : first It's very very easy to miss something like that. That's why I tend to use separate Calculation fields for each step, which I can put on a "debug" layout to more easily see what is actually being calculated rather than what I think is being calculated. One you know it's doing what it is supposed to be doing, you can always copy-paste the formulas over to a nested version if wanted (but making sure that version is working properly before deleting the separate ones). Helpful Harry :o)
Back to comp.databases.filemaker | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
formula question, nested positions Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-06-01 15:39 +0200
Re: formula question, nested positions Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> - 2022-06-02 10:44 +1200
Re: formula question, nested positions Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-06-02 08:18 +0200
Re: formula question, nested positions Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> - 2022-06-03 17:23 +1200
Re: formula question, nested positions Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-06-03 08:03 +0200
Re: formula question, nested positions Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> - 2022-06-03 19:33 +1200
Re: formula question, nested positions Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-06-03 10:10 +0200
Re: formula question, nested positions Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> - 2022-06-04 10:00 +1200
Re: formula question, nested positions Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-06-04 09:37 +0200
csiph-web