Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.databases.filemaker > #599
| From | "Joseph O'Brien" <obrien1984@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.filemaker |
| Subject | serializing a subset of records (FMP6) |
| Date | 2012-02-01 12:18 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <8a0f2829-1163-4bbc-9e81-47e642d870a0@g27g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
I frequently run across a situation in which I need to sequentially
number a subset of records. I have done this several different ways
over the year, but I wanted to see if there is a "right" way.
For example, let's say I have a "jobs" table and a "proofs" table. A
job can have many proofs. Proofs are numbers 1, 2, 3, etc. Simply
serializing the number won't work, because that doesn't "reset" for
each job. In the past, I have scripted it ("Am I the first record in
this relationship? If not, what was the last one? OK, now add 1 to
that."). I also tried to do a calculation to the same effect (I might
have had to concatenate a few values and then pull the right-most
number, or something like that). Both of those seem kind of dirty. Is
there a more elegant way?
Back to comp.databases.filemaker | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
serializing a subset of records (FMP6) "Joseph O'Brien" <obrien1984@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-01 12:18 -0800 Re: serializing a subset of records (FMP6) Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2012-02-01 21:52 +0000 Re: serializing a subset of records (FMP6) HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-02-02 13:26 +1300
csiph-web