Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end From: Derek Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: Figuring out grammars from examples Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:06:49 +0100 Organization: Compilers Central Sender: johnl%iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <24-04-002@comp.compilers> References: <24-04-001@comp.compilers> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="16726"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" Keywords: parse, tools, comment Posted-Date: 14 Apr 2024 12:51:28 EDT X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com In-Reply-To: <24-04-001@comp.compilers> Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:3561 John, > including S-Expressions, JSON, and XML, and outperforms other > state-of-the-art tools. They did not compare their tool against LLMs, which these days outperform non-humans on language related tasks. [I would like to see some actual data. In my experience, LLMs are impressive, confident, and frequently wrong. -John]