Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Re: Are there "compiler generators"?
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:34:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: news.netcologne.de
Lines: 8
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID: <22-06-020@comp.compilers>
References: <Adh1qBBaedSlU0KnQV6Jqmq0ocPhiA==> <22-06-003@comp.compilers> <22-06-017@comp.compilers>
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="65537"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 07 Jun 2022 14:41:53 EDT
X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:3057

minf...@arcor.de <minforth@arcor.de> schrieb:

> But AFAIU there is no such holistic thing like automatic complete
> compiler construction a la
> Compiler = f (grammar, software-infrastructure, target-hardware)

This function misses "semantics" as an argument, probably the
biggest hurdle.