Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end From: Derek Jones Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: Programming language similarity Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:50:23 +0100 Organization: Compilers Central Lines: 9 Sender: news@iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <22-04-022@comp.compilers> References: <22-04-012@comp.compilers> <22-04-016@comp.compilers> <22-04-019@comp.compilers> <22-04-020@comp.compilers> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="98154"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" Keywords: history Posted-Date: 25 Apr 2022 22:40:48 EDT X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <22-04-020@comp.compilers> Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:2988 gah4, > In any case, character set limitations stay with us long after > the reason for the limitation has gone. More than you probably wanted to know about character set history still being with us https://archive.org/details/mackenzie-coded-char-sets