Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From: Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Re: Programming language similarity
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 06:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
Lines: 17
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID: <22-04-016@comp.compilers>
References: <22-04-012@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="57922"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 25 Apr 2022 12:33:39 EDT
X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com
In-Reply-To: <22-04-012@comp.compilers>
Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:2982

On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 4:49:03 AM UTC+2, Derek Jones wrote:
> All,
>
> There has been remarkably little work that tries to measure
> programming language similarity.
>
> Yes, there are many multi-language runtime benchmark comparisons, and
> people extract data from Wikipedia to made dubious claims.
>
> Does anybody know of other kinds of attempts at measuring language
> similarity? ...

Just some "food for thought" on a conceptually similar topic:

Denis Roegel: A brief survey of 20th century logical notations (https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02340520/document)

-atom