Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.com>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees?
Date	Mon, 7 Feb 2022 10:49:30 +0000
Organization	Easynews - www.easynews.com
Lines	24
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<22-02-008@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<22-02-004@comp.compilers> <22-02-006@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="54608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	parse, tools, comment
Posted-Date	07 Feb 2022 13:01:12 EST
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
Content-Language	en-US
In-Reply-To	<22-02-006@comp.compilers>
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:2887

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2/6/2022 10:32 PM, Anton Ertl wrote:
> Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.com> writes:
>> Are there any resources, or papers, about the subject of representing
>> syntax trees graphically?
>
> There are LaTeX modes for displaying trees.  There is also the
> graphviz package for visualizing graphs.

Sure, these are packages.  But no actual algorithms, or discussions of
how to do these things by myself.  Unless there's something in the latex
literature that I haven't found yet.

Between the time of sending this off to the moderation queue and
appearing, I found something about an Ada control flow graph making,
but all it does is offload the graphic bits to graphviz.

I was hoping, that if I did this by myself, I would not have to reinvent
the basics.  That's all.

--
Johann | email: invalid -> com | www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | twitter: @myrkraverk
[I suspect the practical problem is that for any but the tiniest programs
the parse tree will be so large and bushy as to be unreadable. -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Graphical representations of syntax trees? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.com> - 2022-02-04 20:20 +0000
  Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2022-02-06 13:07 -0800
    Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2022-02-06 23:38 +0100
    Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Steve Limb <stephenjohnlimb@gmail.com> - 2022-02-08 09:14 +0000
  Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2022-02-06 22:32 +0000
    Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.com> - 2022-02-07 10:49 +0000
      Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2022-02-07 18:33 +0000
      Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Jonathan Thornburg <jonathan@gold.bkis-orchard.net> - 2022-02-08 21:34 +0000
        Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2022-02-11 21:16 +0000
  Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2022-02-07 18:17 -0800

csiph-web