Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees?
Date	Sun, 6 Feb 2022 23:38:31 +0100
Organization	Compilers Central
Lines	21
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<22-02-007@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<22-02-004@comp.compilers> <22-02-005@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="90235"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	parse, tools
Posted-Date	06 Feb 2022 18:23:06 EST
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:2886

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2/6/22 10:07 PM, gah4 wrote:

> The main complication with doing this, is positioning the items
> on the page.

Right, that's a big problem. For my decompilers I wrote a flexible tree
representation of the parse tree with online navigation through the
tree. Source code for Atari ST in GfA Basic has gone long ago :-(

> I do remember knowing about programs to print out flow charts,
> but that is different. But it also has the same problem of positioning
> on the page.

That's not really different. A parse tree only includes more information
(nodes) than the original flow chart of the code.

Another solution may be a structure like used with source code. Blocks
or functions are not arranged LTR but top down. Subtrees are indented
and broken into multiple lines instead of nodes appended LTR.

DoDi

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Graphical representations of syntax trees? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.com> - 2022-02-04 20:20 +0000
  Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2022-02-06 13:07 -0800
    Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2022-02-06 23:38 +0100
    Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Steve Limb <stephenjohnlimb@gmail.com> - 2022-02-08 09:14 +0000
  Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2022-02-06 22:32 +0000
    Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.com> - 2022-02-07 10:49 +0000
      Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2022-02-07 18:33 +0000
      Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Jonathan Thornburg <jonathan@gold.bkis-orchard.net> - 2022-02-08 21:34 +0000
        Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2022-02-11 21:16 +0000
  Re: Graphical representations of syntax trees? "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2022-02-07 18:17 -0800

csiph-web