Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
Date	Thu, 30 Dec 2021 13:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Organization	Compilers Central
Lines	24
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<21-12-033@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<21-12-003@comp.compilers> <21-12-017@comp.compilers> <21-12-022@comp.compilers> <21-12-026@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Info	gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="13670"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords	parse, history
Posted-Date	30 Dec 2021 18:45:53 EST
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
In-Reply-To	<21-12-026@comp.compilers>
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:2782

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 7:56:15 PM UTC+1, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> When I started programming from nothing, I saw BASIC examples in a
> book which was doing things like:
>
> 10 X = 2
> 20 X = X + 1
>
> The only language with formulas that I was coming from was math.
>
> So, I thought, what? How can X be equal to X + 1; you cannot solve
> this absurdity!
>
> From then I knew that the people who program computers to understand
> symbols are free thinkers who make them mean anything they want.

"X = X + Y" means "X[t+1] = X[t] + Y[t]" where t is time. Time had to be
omitted from the notation of the BASIC programming language because otherwise
the source code would consume a much larger amount of computer memory and it
would complicate GOTO and FOR/NEXT statements.

-atom
[Interesting take.  In reality, of couse, BASIC borrowed that from Fortran.  Algol
used := for assignment, different from = for equality comparison. -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

csiph-web