Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2726
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Kartik Agaram <ak@akkartik.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? |
| Date | Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:23:33 -0700 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 12 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <21-10-018@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <21-10-017@comp.compilers> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="39731"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | history |
| Posted-Date | 12 Oct 2021 11:17:24 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| In-Reply-To | <21-10-017@comp.compilers> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:2726 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On a slight tangent, I've never liked the term "compiler". I prefer "translator". "Translator" maps well with "interpreter" when talking about natural languages. That seems like a good reason to also use it for computer languages. Bringing it back to this thread, I think the difference between compilers and transpilers is largely meaningless. They're both just translators. [It is about 65 years too late to change "compiler". On the other hand, approximately nobody uses "transpiler" and we can use something less cute like translator, or the classic SIFT. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> - 2021-10-11 13:26 +0000
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Kartik Agaram <ak@akkartik.com> - 2021-10-11 11:23 -0700
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-10-12 20:05 +0200
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2021-10-16 17:16 +0000
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-16 20:22 +0000
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-10-16 23:55 +0200
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-10-17 07:02 +0200
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2021-10-17 15:01 -0700
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? "Detlef Meyer-Eltz" <Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de> - 2021-10-12 11:34 +0200
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? jan van katwijk <j.vankatwijk@gmail.com> - 2021-10-12 17:59 +0200
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-10-12 20:19 +0200
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> - 2021-10-14 00:33 +0300
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2021-10-16 17:26 +0000
Re: Are transpiling techniques different than compiling techniques? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2021-10-17 08:37 -0700
csiph-web