Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From: carlglassberg@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ?
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 13:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Compilers Central
Lines: 15
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID: <20-01-009@comp.compilers>
References: <19-12-016@comp.compilers> <19-12-030@comp.compilers> <19-12-032@comp.compilers> <19-12-040@comp.compilers> <20-01-001@comp.compilers> <20-01-003@comp.compilers> <20-01-008@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="57841"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: syntax
Posted-Date: 06 Jan 2020 09:37:45 EST
X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com
In-Reply-To: <20-01-008@comp.compilers>
Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:2429

correction:
  ((a b &&))((c d & &&)) for EBNF: a { b a } c { d c }
should be:
  ((a b &&))((c d &&)) for EBNF: a { b a } c { d c }

and
  ((a b && c d & &&))
should be:
  ((a b && c d &&))

Don't know how those extraneous single "&" got there!

Carl
---