Path: csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end From: David Brown Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: Optimization techniques Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 09:03:53 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Sender: news@iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <19-05-001@comp.compilers> References: <19-04-004@comp.compilers> <19-04-012@comp.compilers> <19-04-018@comp.compilers> <19-04-028@comp.compilers> <19-04-036@comp.compilers> <19-04-050@comp.compilers> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="53117"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" Keywords: errors, comment Posted-Date: 01 May 2019 21:30:12 EDT X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com Content-Language: en-GB Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:2237 On 01/05/2019 03:07, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 17:22:26 +0200, David Brown > wrote: > > [snip] > >> Obviously compiler writers are expected to pay more attention to these >> details than someone making a Usenet post! > > What? I can not trust the godlings in comp.compilers? > Maybe others, but not me. I give my opinions, advice and help freely on Usenet, with the best of intentions but not necessarily the best of results or as much time and thought as for serious work. If I say something wrong, I guarantee you your money back. I think this applies to most posters. [This newsgroup is moderated, not peer reviewed. I look at all the messages and I will send back messages that are incoherent or with obvious mistakes ("Linux Torvalds invented C++") but I certainly don't claim to be omniscient. -John]