Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Re: Optimization techniques
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:07:34 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID: <19-04-050@comp.compilers>
References: <19-04-004@comp.compilers> <19-04-012@comp.compilers> <19-04-018@comp.compilers> <19-04-028@comp.compilers> <19-04-036@comp.compilers>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="92324"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: errors
Posted-Date: 30 Apr 2019 22:20:53 EDT
X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:2234

On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 17:22:26 +0200, David Brown
<david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:

[snip]

>Obviously compiler writers are expected to pay more attention to these
>details than someone making a Usenet post!

     What?  I can not trust the godlings in comp.compilers?

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko